[Arm-netbook] More AC100 Modding Goodness
gordan at bobich.net
Wed Feb 8 14:29:20 GMT 2012
lkcl luke wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net> wrote:
>> lkcl luke wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net> wrote:
>>>> Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
>>>>> lkcl luke wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Gordan Bobic<gordan at bobich.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> I thought it can drive 1920x2160 (2x 1080), can it not?
>>>>>> 3840 x 2160 is the official definition of 2160p.
>>>>> and the A10 can output that?
>>>> So I keep hearing. I haven't seen any reports from anyone who actually
>>>> tried it.
>>> ah you've seen the cost of 3840 x 2160 monitors, then?
>> I have a 3840x2400 monitor on my desk:
>> IBM T221:
>> What I haven't seen is an A10 device with two dual-link DVI ports. If
>> you can provide a suitable A10 device, I'll happily test it for you. :)
>> Then again, it seems fair to consider that until there is a suitably
>> equipped device (in this case, equipped with 2+ DL-DVI ports) - the SoC
>> can't do it. An unused/unimplemented feature, is a useless/nonexistant
> deep joy. so it looks like the MPEG decoder can do 2160p but the
> hardware can't get the bloody data off!
Sounds like classis specmanship* to me. :)
specmanship, n: The art of misrepresenting capabilities of a device for
marketing purposes, typically by saying it will do X and Y when it
cannot in fact to X and Y at the same time.
This might be a good time to check if those extra "undocumented"
features like SATA are actually wired up. ;)
More information about the arm-netbook