As I was reading the EOMA standard[*] in the section entitled "Interoperability Restrictions imposed by height limits", I came across a statement
Type III 8.0mm cards must be actively prevented from slotting into Type I (5.0mm) Housings by ensuring that there is a physical slot in the casework that is no more than 5.5mm in height.
which I think would probably reflect your meaning better if rewritten as follows:
Type III 8.0mm cards must be actively prevented from slotting into Type II (5.0mm) Housings by ensuring that there is a physical slot in the casework that is no more than 5.5mm in height.
Because the previous paragraph dealt with restrictions on Type I Housings (which accept 3.3mm high cards) and this mentions 5.0mm cards (which correspond to Type II).
Reference: [*] https://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA68/Hardware#Pinout...
Sent from my iPhone
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Richard Wilbur richard.wilbur@gmail.com wrote:
As I was reading the EOMA standard[*] in the section entitled "Interoperability Restrictions imposed by height limits", I came across a statement
Type III 8.0mm cards must be actively prevented from slotting into Type I (5.0mm) Housings by ensuring that there is a physical slot in the casework that is no more than 5.5mm in height.
yep.
which I think would probably reflect your meaning better if rewritten as follows:
Type III 8.0mm cards must be actively prevented from slotting into Type II (5.0mm) Housings by ensuring that there is a physical slot in the casework that is no more than 5.5mm in height.
Because the previous paragraph dealt with restrictions on Type I Housings (which accept 3.3mm high cards) and this mentions 5.0mm cards (which correspond to Type II).
ok it should be prevented from fitting into both Type I *and* Type II.
l.
arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
-
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton -
Richard Wilbur