It's a shame that none of the previous EOMA-68 devices got off the ground before Intel pulled this out - "hey this already exists" would've been a serious advantage for EOMA-68 as a standard.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jonathan Frederickson silverskullpsu@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net wrote:
which are, in your opinion, the "right set of interfaces"? serious question. if you're going to make such comments, you'd better be prepared to back them up and be prepared to justify them with a *REALLY* thorough analysis.
I think all he meant was that Intel can pick whatever interfaces they want for the standard that they think will be relatively future-proof. They don't have to worry about finding SoCs with those interfaces, because they manufacture the SoCs - they just have to decide on them at the start.