On 02/11/2017 05:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
you're going to have to demonstrate to me that systemd has been developed (and deployed) in a 100% ethical manner
So systemd is guilty until proven innocent?
Alright then, unless you can demonstrate to me that the EOMA68-A20 has been developed and deployed in a 100% "ethical" manner (where I am not going to explain what "ethical" means), I am going to assume that it is unethical and refuse to support it.
Except I'm not actually going to do that, because that would be unreasonable. There's a reason our courts don't work this way.