On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:30:10 +0100 "Aaron J. Seigo" aseigo@kde.org wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 14:55:43 luke.leighton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Aaron J. Seigo aseigo@kde.org wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:44:42 luke.leighton wrote:
knowledge is being generated and then *thrown away*.
not when i'm doing it. i document everything as i'm going along, because i've done this a number of times. it does however begin to
I know you try to do this, but it isn’t producing results useful to others.
try my patience to have to follow up pretty much every single message to arm-netbooks with "could you please put that on the wiki”.
That’s because the wiki is not useful. If it were, people would be using it.
In part this is because there is no “the wiki”: there is the wiki on rhombus- tech.net which starts with "Welcome to Rhombus Tech, a CIC company”, there is elinux.org which a wonderful maze of relevant and not-relevant information and there is the linux-sunxi.org wiki.
We should discuss all this during the future irc meeting, starting by defining what our needs are as a group, what our expectations are, cataloging our current assets and then creating process that may work for us to move us forward.
"would people be open to having one with the goal of improving this situation?”
yes!
ok, cool. for you, evenings (UTC) and weekends work better than daytime, correct? i’m thinking of something in early January to get this started ...
Just a question to avoid any possible misunderstanding. Are you trying to organize and manage only the Rhombus / EOMA / Mer people? Or is it a larger scale ambition?
Because if it's related to EOMA and arm-netbook list only, then it's really your own business.
But if you also include linux-sunxi.org in your plans, then I propose to first learn a bit more about this community. It just looks like you literally appear from nowhere, have only incomplete preliminary information and already trying to enforce your own rules on the others. Not everyone is going to appreciate this.