11 Dec
2013
11 Dec
'13
10:46 p.m.
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 22:10:35 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so, to be clear: you may not *assume* that the code is GPL'd: permission and instructions have *already been given* that it *is* GPL'd, *despite* notices on the files which state otherwise.
is there any record of this discussion? that would be helpful.
--
Aaron J. Seigo