I think you're being a bit literal there. I don't see any problem with what Ron is doing. As far as I can tell, he's well within US Copyright Law's "Fair Use" clause (17 USC Section 107). I realize it's more likely to be the Berne Convention that would apply here -- but the Fair Use Clause is something of a benchmark.
I don't see that Ron is intending to derive personal gain or profit from the use case he's come up with. He's just kind of trying to have fun with a hobbyist project. Even if that hobbyist project ends up on e.g. Instructables -- that doesn't reflect on YOU anywhere near as much as it does HIM. Technically, yes, you've made the project possible, but it's HIS project, and it's made pretty clear to anyone who subsequently takes on that project that THEY as a third party (at best) are personally liable for their own feckups -- and I would bet a goodly sum of money (if I had it) that the courts would be all to glad to remind them of this, if it came to that. You'd probably even be able to recoup court costs if anyone was stupid enough to challenge you directly on that one -- it's simply too well established.
Forgive me for sayin' -- but you're coming across as something of a bully here. Your concerns are largely unfounded, given a reasonable, fair, and equitable court system... which, at least for these purposes, is something quite reasonable to expect. I realize I'm not in command, but I'm still going to ask you politely to lay off here.