... is going to quickly turn into a clusterf*** if people don't step in sharp-ish and help out.
[Wikipedia correctness and authoritative edits]
interesting situation - one that wikipedia's clearly never had to deal with before.
Rather than spend a paragraph or two talking about that, I suggest that we just build more robust external sources that the Wikipedia page can make use of. Personally, I'm not a Wikipedia person, but I can possibly spend a little more time looking at the page. (My previous edits were mostly about fixing up citations, of which more are needed as the page stands.)
yeahyeah, i noticed - appreciated.
okay. well, i've had to revert *six* false and misleading statements on the page... so far. unfortunately the wikifascists [1] are beginning to step in - one of them unfortunately has Administrative rights. a "COI" notice was set up: this resulted in a rash of further misleading and factually incorrect statements being made.
if people care about this, can you please step in?
l.
[1] definition (2) of http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fascist