10 Jul
2018
10 Jul
'18
9:11 p.m.
On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net wrote: interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB Berkeley,[0] via a structure that is similar to the failed Google Project Ara ("it's open as long as you sign our secret agreement and don't publish information we don't want you to").
Are you referring to "Design Assurance"(as 3) and "Security"(as 5)?
Seems like an advertisement specifically against risc-v by and for ARM.
I'm sorry to hear about those terms on a project with any pretensions of being "open".
Notes: [0] UCB stands for "University of California at Berkeley" so the intermediate form is normally "UC Berkeley".