Looks good.
Could I ask you to produce variants of this:
- without colour
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321752
- low resolution/small size
100p wide: https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321542
- (1) & (2)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321642
The reason is that a logo is going to be used in many places and still has to be robustly recognisable. So all candidate logos should be 'tested' by checking how they look when mangled as above.
Regards
Licenses: Same as before (Whatever lkcl wants, otherwise cc-sa-by-4.0)