On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:02 PM, David Boddie <david@boddie.org.uk> wrote:

> It's clearly not comparable to the EOMA68 laptop because it lacks the
> modularity, and is obviously not as flexible as a result, and it's fairly
> limited in terms of the interfaces and expansion options it offers.

 and uses a processor which cannot be brought up without a proprietary
binary-only bootloader, yippeee!