On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valhalla@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-05-26 at 14:49:44 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
- Others may get blocked purly on ego
that would be genuinely stupid. as you probably know i am pretty pathological about decision-making when it comes to achieving specific goals. things like "ego" don't come into it. i assess "is this going to further the goal, yes or no" and that really is the end of it: there *is* no "this person is a dick therefore they are out". they can be as much of a dick as they like, as long as they get results that don't jeapordise the goal.
at some point i want a foundation, and a charter that i am happy will be able to continue without my input - i will have other things to do. we are however looking at like 3-5 years into the future.
In other messages you mentioned that it wasn't you but your associate who blacklisted Aaron Seigo from using the EOMA name *and* from building an EOMA compatible products, the same associate who seems also to be not really interesting in contributing with the FLOSS community anymore.
If, as it seems from those messages, it is your associate who has control over the EOMA specs,
no - i do. he doesn't have the technical expertise.
how can we be sure that the openness you want for it will be maintained?
good point. let me think... i know: if he doesn't listen then i will resign. that would terminate the project as he needs my technical expertise.
l.