30 Apr
2017
30 Apr
'17
4:33 a.m.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Jonathan Frederickson silverskullpsu@gmail.com wrote:
Plus this is much less wasteful of materials - this looks like something you could cut on a 12"x12" sheet of plywood, whereas the previous design required much more (because you couldn't really use the leftover pieces from cutting the inner layers).
yeahyeah, the previous version was c-shaped pieces, 3mm thick. this is 20mm for top and bottom and 15mm for the sides, which are rectangular. on 2 600x600mm pieces i managed to fit i think it was 6 each of the top/bottom pieces and... goodness knows how many of the sides. 20 of each or something.
so yes it's a lot less wasteful.
l.