<div dir="ltr">Oh ok so do you have any draft idea what kind of housing the eoma 68 standard will utilize ?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net" target="_blank">lkcl@lkcl.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">---<br>
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: <a href="https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.crowdsupply.com/<wbr>eoma68</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</span><span class="">On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Bill Kontos <<a href="mailto:vkontogpls@gmail.com">vkontogpls@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Ok so basically this will allow type II cards( smaller) to fit into type III<br>
> housings<br>
<br>
</span> yyep.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> and utilize higher clocks ?<br>
<br>
</span> or many more cores, or... whatever.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> Also from my understanding the type III<br>
> card will be the physical form factor used for the EOMA 200 standard ?<br>
<br>
</span> absolutely not.  EOMA200 is a completely separate standard,<br>
absolutely nothing to do with EOMA68.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
l.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
arm-netbook mailing list <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook</a><br>
Send large attachments to <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>