<div dir="ltr">Yea that's what I meant, sorry my bad. My question is, what physical form factor will the EOMA 200 cards have( that is, what will "house" the electronics) ?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net" target="_blank">lkcl@lkcl.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Bill Kontos <<a href="mailto:vkontogpls@gmail.com">vkontogpls@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Oh ok so do you have any draft idea what kind of housing the eoma 68<br>
> standard will utilize ?<br>
<br>
</span> good question, easily answered (in perhaps a perplexing answer,<br>
apologies) - anything that people wish to envisage. it's not down to<br>
me (or the standard) to *restrict* people on what kind of housings are<br>
created, in fact the total opposite is the case (hence why i am<br>
creating reference designs). btw "Housing" has a special meaning in<br>
EOMA68 terminology, where's that glossary, can anyone remember? :)<br>
<br>
now i think about it, you *might* have used the word "housing"<br>
without it being specifically in EOMA68 terminology - in which case<br>
you *might* be referring to PCMCIA Type I, II and III sockets. it<br>
*is* necessary to comply with the *PHYSICAL* sizes of the PCMCIA<br>
sockets and *PHYSICAL* PCMCIA card dimensions.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
l.<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
arm-netbook mailing list <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook</a><br>
Send large attachments to <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>