<html><head></head><body>Gonna have to agree, logo should work in black and white <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On January 30, 2017 4:50:35 PM GMT+03:00, Alain Williams <addw@phcomp.co.uk> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:33:46AM -0500, Julie Marchant wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 01/30/2017 05:25 AM, Alain Williams wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> Unfortunately that is not good enough ... you are assuming that people will use<br /> the monchrome version of the logo rather than just photocopying the colour one<br /> on a monochrome copyier.<br /></blockquote> <br /> You can easily prevent that with a trademark policy... and why would<br /> someone choose to make their own half-baked monochrome conversion when a<br /> proper one is available?<br /></blockquote><br />Because they have a piece of paper about whatever and the logo happens to be on<br />there. Producing a new document is too much effort, they just photocopy it for<br />whatever purpose.<br /><br />Many people just do the minimum to do what they have to, they won't care at all<br />about some logo of something that they might not even understand.<br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>