<html><head></head><body>Definitely put no royalty fees at the top. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On January 8, 2017 3:42:50 PM GMT+03:00, Alexander Ross <maillist_arm-netbook@aross.me> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">How to market eoma68 vs intel card in a positive way?<br /><br />Heres a go, please edit,suggest as you feel. hmm sounds like a wiki page<br />is coming :) :<br /><br />EOMA68:<br />*Grass roots developed - made by someone who cares<br />*Any processor make<br />*Made with free software and its developers in mind. to help advance and<br />fund free software.<br />*Hardware that just works for free software and there for any software<br />*Makes it easier for the creation and maintenance of many, yet to be<br />thought of, new devices.<br />*Higher Spec additional standard EOMA200 in the works after current ones<br />products are in the market.<br />*Smaller, extra compact card Spec, EOMACF addition also on the future list.<br />*Only certification fees. No royalty fees<br />*Made by for profit making but good will first company, as opposite to<br />extreme maximising company. The priority is the best computer card<br />standards.<br />*EOMA68 is spec’ed for lower power consuming devices. ideal for battery<br />power devices. See future EOMA200 for high power consumption / more<br />powerful computers(SOCS)<br />*hmm what else?<br /><br /><hr /><br />arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk<br /><a href="http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook">http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook</a><br />Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk</pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>