<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-09-21 3:47 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net" target="_blank">lkcl@lkcl.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">---<br>
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: <a href="https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.crowdsupply.com/<wbr>eoma68</a><br>
<span class="gmail-"><br>
<br>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Paul Boddie <<a href="mailto:paul@boddie.org.uk">paul@boddie.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I don't really want to weigh in on a topic that I don't have any specific<br>
> interest or expertise in, but my impression was (Musk aside) that nobody<br>
> really expects battery technology to stick with lithium or "rare earths".<br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Musk's take of the cut, drivers others to find alternatives.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-">
> Here, progress in materials science appears to be driving development towards<br>
> more mundane materials.<br>
<br>
</span> that just leaves copper. if there existed a room-temperature<br>
flexible superconductor replacement we'd do okay.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We're getting there:</div><div><a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/Timeline_of_Superconductivity_from_1900_to_2015.svg">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/Timeline_of_Superconductivity_from_1900_to_2015.svg</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://phys.org/news/2016-02-graphene-superconductiveelectrons-mass-resistance.html">http://phys.org/news/2016-02-graphene-superconductiveelectrons-mass-resistance.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>But it'll take a while before production. But the higher the demands on batteries and semiconductors. The harder the search for alternatives.</div><div><br></div><div>All semiconductor companies have serious trouble further miniaturizing silicon lithography. If we find ways to reduce resistance in the materials than the miniaturization becomes less of an issue.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
l.<br>
</font></span><div class="gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-h5"><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
arm-netbook mailing list <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook</a><br>
Send large attachments to <a href="mailto:arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk">arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>