<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br></blockquote></div><div>i don't think allwinner will do that. They just want to avoid responsibilities by not releasing the</div><div>source code. And even releasing is not officially and publicly, it's "leaked". </div>
<div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why is it "leaked". I am not a license guru, but isn't it true that Allwinner need to provid the source to there customers in this case QWare as they bought the hardware to make their tablet. QWare on their end only need to release the source to their customers etc etc.</div>
<div><br></div><div>QWare just did what they need to do. Release the source to their customers. For that reason, we could just stamp this source by "QWare released", which is fine or not?</div></div></div>