<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<small>On 03/30/2012 11:59 AM, lkcl luke wrote:</small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPweEDwLj6rXNEjpzkUOS+4V5menraz7CyOODhUgm1OHRpWETw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2012/3/29 Henrik Nordström <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:henrik@henriknordstrom.net"><henrik@henriknordstrom.net></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">tor 2012-03-29 klockan 21:59 +0800 skrev Julien Forgeat:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I am making slow progress but now running in problems with building
the kernel. Turns out arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump segfaults with the
following:
/bin/sh: line 1: 6174 Segmentation fault
arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump -D standby.elf > standby.lst
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Ouch. Why is it doing that?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
hmm, julien: can you do "arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump --version" and
also describe where _exactly_ you got that version of binutils from?
l.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<small>I got the package here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi">http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi</a><br>
<br>
And the version check gives me: <br>
<br>
julien@JulienE125:~$ arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump --version<br>
GNU objdump (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.21.53.20110810<br>
Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.<br>
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the
terms of<br>
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any
later version.<br>
This program has absolutely no warranty.<br>
<br>
Could it be that I should only use the Debian package?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Julien</small><br>
</body>
</html>