<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:45 PM, lkcl luke <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luke.leighton@gmail.com" target="_blank">luke.leighton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
> BTW, one of my goals is to get a port going of Debian armhf tailored for the<br><div>
> Raspberry Pi. The standard Debian armhf port should work great on the Mele<br>
> A1000 once the kernel issues are worked out, but this is not the case for<br>
> the Raspberry Pi which needs everything recompiled for the ARMv6+VFP<br>
> capabilities of it's CPU. That's a pretty tall order and one that is still<br>
> to be determined as being worthwhile.<br>
<br>
</div> bear in mind: the CPU is booted by the GPU, which is proprietary.<br>
why would _any_ debian developer want to aid and assist broadcom to<br>
further its goals of keeping total absolute control over its hardware?<br></blockquote></div><br>I'm not actually a Debian developer, but rather an enthusiast of small systems and Debian is a great platform that has just always worked for me. I'm a fairly adept user of Debian, but now I'm being forced to learn it at a much deeper level. I love the concept of free and open software and have created open projects in the past, but I also am a bit pragmatic in this regards. Just as Microsoft is Microsoft, Apple is Apple, the RPi is what it is. Hopefully Rhombus and similar efforts will prevail, but the RPi efforts do have some attraction even if the black box aspects are irksome. Besides, with their launch snafus they seem to be shooting themselves in the foot right now and blowing a lot of good PR. It's sad, but it does create an opportunity for other efforts to steal their thunder.<br>
<br>In any case, hopefully a fully working kernel will be available for the A1000 by the time my hardware shows up. But if not, I'll lend a hand where I can.<br><br>Mike<br>