[Arm-netbook] Kernel proliferation

[Alejandro Mery]

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:43 PM, lkcl luke <luke.leighton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:13 PM, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote:
>> So we appear to have about a bajillion different kernels of various
>> different versions and statuses.
>>
>> Is there an 'official' good kernel that we should be doing development
>> on, and that patches etc should be submitted for?
>
>  really, the process should begin on upstream submission, even bits at
> a time.  that way the 'official' good kernel is always on
> vger.kernel.org

sure upstream submission is the ultimate goal, but there are smaller
shorter term goals like getting what we have working, and to give
people already having A10-based devices something they can use today
while preparing the codebase to be acceptable by upstream standards,
that people will be testing the changes.